FriendEd vs VeganGains Live Debate

FriendEd and I discuss the moral implications of eating meat.

outro: Beef by KRS-One
Follow me on Facebook:
Support me on Patreon:

FriendEd vs VeganGains Live Debate

FriendEd and I discuss the moral implications of eating meat.

outro: Beef by KRS-One
Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Vegan-Gains-750568258359704/
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/vegangains

27 thoughts on “FriendEd vs VeganGains Live Debate

  1. “I DON’T NEED A *GOOD* REASON TO KILL, I JUST NEED *A* REASON!!!”

    Constantly throwing out bad arguments while being aware that they don’t actually make logical justifications for your position might as well be the definition of intellectual dishonesty. DId he ever even give at least a single argument in defence of his behaviour that he actually holds?

  2. 1:33:19 *So apparantely if anybody is pressured to do anything, like murder a baby, rape a drunk girl at a party, anything else, then it’s “human nature” and we should allow that. Good job, friended, you fucking moron*

    1. *And then he replies with a subtle appeal to futility when he answers vegan gains’ question right after that, saying that reality is just the way it is, so we should accept it. Reality = people eat meat. So that means we shouldn’t try to change anything*

  3. If anyone is interested in helping out an animal charity that works with abuse and neglect victims check out saleranchsanctuary.org. Thanks again for having me on Richard!

    1. If anyone is interested in helping out with animal cruelty that works with abuse and torture for food check out saleranchslaughterhouses.org. Thanks again for allowing me to post my little nonvegan recruitment volunteer type suggestion here too Tim Jong Un!

  4. *Totally unbiased summary:* FriendEd made many irrelevant points and for the most part didn’t answer questions directly. Near the end he resorts to bacon tho. On another note I must say that he didn’t repeat himself; Richard did extremely well with explaining his arguments in this debate to the point where each question Ed asked dug him deeper into the hole… Ed didn’t repeat himself due to realization of his faulty arguments, but wouldn’t vocally acknowledge it because bacon tho, hence Richard sensing dishonesty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *