Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge

Cutting Edge Secret to Prevent Stroke and Heart Disease Naturally!

heart-disease - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge

Click here to learn the cutting edge secret your doctor will never want you to know!

1 - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge 2 - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge 3 - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge
What Is The Chinese
Secret To Optimum
Blood Pressure?
Why This Is The
Healthiest Oil On Earth?
Click To Learn More
Bring Your Old
Battery Back To Life!
4 - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge 5 - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge 6 - Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge
How To Survive In
Bed & Nail Women
Like A Rockstar!
100% of Your
Vital Nutrition In
Just 30 Seconds
How A 2000-Year-Old
Nepalese Secret To Cure
Your Sciatica in 7
DAYS OR LESS

Roaming Millennial seems pretty confident that she can defend her position in a live debate. Bring it on.

Support me on Patreon:
Ask Yourself's video:
Roaming Milleniall's video:
outro: Beef by KRS-One
Follow me on Facebook:

Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge

Roaming Millennial seems pretty confident that she can defend her position in a live debate. Bring it on.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/vegangains
Ask Yourself's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZC1AJv1MQk&t=70s
Roaming Milleniall's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwhRxjaq5Yc
outro: Beef by KRS-One
Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Vegan-Gains-750568258359704/

65 thoughts on “Roaming Millennial Live Debate Challenge

    1. vegans are vitamin deficiency hehe heh he…cancer is a good thing heheh he heh
      do you believe that guy thinks cancer is the sign of healthy body? lol

    2. Well I watched his video and lost 17 IQ points.

      I sort of feel like this excretion is not worth responding to. Will only lead to a surge of views he doesn’t deserve. He doesn’t have a very big reach. Most of what he’s saying is hard to take seriously probably even for meat-fans of average intelligence.

      A bunch of bullshit conspiratory absolutist non-arguments. “Those things were never food eheh heheh..” “It’s what THEY ehe heheh want you to eat eheh he..” “The government wants to kill you hehe eeehehe..”

      It’s incredibly ironic that he calls veganism a religion yet worships whatever is “natural”.

    3. well i watched more than a video of him. so guess how much did i lost? lol
      16k people are taking him serious and i think his videos about vegans need a response
      1/4 of his videos are about vegan diet and lifestyle.
      i think richard needs to make a response for his claims.

    4. Haha!

      Well the video I watched had only about 3k views but yeah I saw his sub count is higher than that.

      The thing is though that I don’t think a conspiratorial mind like his is not going to be possible to reason with. I doubt that he’s open to hearing anyone of us out. He’ll just claim that we’re brainwashed by the government or something predictable like that.

      I guess it could be worth making a video not for him but the subset of his audience that hasn’t fully bought into his ridiculous reasoning yet.. I dunno.

    1. +AlbeitBeast

      *Okay, evolution says everything came from chance by a vacuum suction that spit everything out creating the entire universe from nothing.*

      Nope, evolution is the theory (which has been proven) that life is plastic to environments because of genetic mutations.

      *Okay if they died out slowly then why do we have them in poses as if they were frozen? Wouldn’t they have decayed or been eaten by other animals/dinos before they were fossilized over “billions of years”? In fact when researchers studied them, it looked as if they were stopped dead in their tracks so fast because of a change in temperature that only happens if they were at the very bottom of a vast rise in water, like a massive flood.*

      This is just entirely wrong. Fossils are extremely rare in nature, for starters. Just out of curiosity, how does something die without being in a position at the time of death? To my knowledge, there are no fossils of animals running- you’re just making that up.

      *DNA also couldn’t just “happen by chance”. They say that we evolve by “mutations” of the DNA numbers we have, but over the years of observation every human and animal can only have their code taken some away, or added another letter in the structure of already existing DNA. There hasn’t been any ‘new’ form at all, and evolutionists say “It’s just because we haven’t seen it yet!” well then you have no proof to go off of. If you take a box of legos and have it shaken up for billions of years, it would be impossible for the pieces to be put together into a plane wouldn’t it? It’s the exact same way with evolution, it couldn’t happen by chance.*

      You literally don’t know what you’re talking about at all. There are no “DNA numbers.” Why don’t you at least go read a Wikipedia article? Lol and your example is just WRONG by probability/statistics. If you shook a bag of legos for BILLIONS of years, it would be impossible for there _not_ to be any stuck together. It’s the same reason your headphone wires will magically tangle themselves up if you leave them in your pocket- probability/statistics.

    2. Christopher Newell Funny how you think not believing in God makes you automatically smart. You don’t even have a clue what God is.

      When the Universe ends, It will not end. The Universe ending is just the Universe It self.
      You are One with the Universe, One with God & you will always be here in some form

    1. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to be smart; I think Joseph means she’s a pseudo-intellectual.

  1. Roaming Millennial should have a *one night stand* with Vegan Gains so that she can improve her intelligence

    1. Fruit Zombie you look like you took up veganism because your face made eating meat not an option. You won’t be getting porked that’s for sure

    2. Fruit Zombie, why respond to trolls? Big waste of energy, plus its the parasites inside of them feeding of the energy you give them at all, just like aimlessly meditating wide open to a F wave/netium portal or the idolized programming enter to tain you tell lie vision. 6 years free from mainstream tv and can’t be happier. Except I never comment or hardly read cause youtube plagued with trolls and fakes. If I see hate, it comes from deep within them hating themselves and being confused cause parasites are meant to hate the powerful, the spiritual, the righteous, if you abide by the 42 laws of MA’AT you are doing well. Spread the love, meat eaters will be the meak, the harvest is coming soon, but most ignorant people will internalize that into something satanic. Well….most of you actually do, ya demons. OUCH. Etymology run deep, de=against mon=mankind. Going against amma mamma, greed, polluting and never giving back to the land. The test is almost over, sacred tablets, moorish knowledge. HUH WHUT. I said enough. Speak in tongue for those to hear, many will not and it should be that way. Only the righteous rise up with hearts as light as a feather. =]

    1. I don’t think she’d be tight, after all the response fucking she got from vegans. now she just wants a live gangbang

  2. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿพ….this is why I like Vegan gains

    1. Nationalism is Love WTF I did not saying anything about sleeping around. I said people do have sex for pleasure not just children. Couples, usually have sex for pleasure more than they sex for children. If you have any type of sex other than “traditional” sex including oral, having sex that you don’t plan to have children, or masturbate, you are being a hypocrite saying other people are disgusting for not having sex to bear children.

    2. Nationalism is Love WTF I did not saying anything about sleeping around. I said people do have sex for pleasure not just children. Couples, usually have sex for pleasure more than they sex for children. If you have any type of sex other than “traditional” sex including oral, having sex that you don’t plan to have children, or masturbate, you are being a hypocrite saying other people are disgusting for not having sex to bear children.

    1. I also want to mention her argument on supping b12 is so strawman it’s cringy. Every Vegan knows and says to supp b12 and it’s not even an issue of whether we’re hiding the fact or thinking it’s a weak point of veganism. And it’s a lame argument anyway cuz everyone these days supps whether meat eater or not. Same with D – vit. D is just a general deficiency these days with not being in the sun enough PLUS probably the reduction of dairy consumption by many which has it fortified. AND supping is strawman also, in general, as even athletes, bodybuilders, healthy ppl etc. supp and not because they have deficiencies. Her avoidance of the debate focusing on the point of just wanting to debate the topic of extreme radical behavior of vegans is cringy also as it’s obvious she totally can’t win on the general topic of veganism and ethics and nutrition. She’s probably the dumbest critic of veganism, i’ve seen, even worst than Bearing, lol.

      She’s also a censor nazi (ironic being such an alt rightie) and deletes my comments like:
      “Must be that asian side to you – soulless, materialistic, superficial,
      anything-that-moves-eating, dog-yamming, cat-succulentizing
      don-giv-a-fuk-bu-money, sad prissy [yellow] snow flake. heehee”

    1. The Vegan MUA Personally, I would’ve just had the humility of admitting defeat and going Vegan after my video got widely disproved. But then again, I can actually appreciate someone who actually has the balls to have a debate, albeit She will undoubtedly use terrible arguments.

    2. Deplora Bull Actually, Roaming never said she disagreed with the Vegetarian life style. It was the smug attitude of the people who live that way that she took issue with.
      I have yet to see any of you vegetarians address that part.

  3. Richard don’t forget to bring up that:

    1. If she says lower intelligence is the determing factor whether she thinks it is okay to kill a living being then it must be okay to kill mentally disabled people.

    2. She said vegans are angry and hostile while SHE is the one paying a person to slit a living being’s throat and let it bleed to death on a concrete floor in a slaughter house.

    3. Her facts about nutrition were false and she cherry picked ONE doctor who was paid by the meat and egg industry and tried to make him seem like he is the only one with the ultimate truth and she didn’t even refer to proper studies. She also forgot to mention that when you cook meat and fish HCAs and PAHs are created in the meat/fish and they are known carcinogens. So when she talks about “vegan diets are not healthy” she shows how little nutritional knowledge she actually has about the downside of eating meat and fish.

    Good luck and show her what real logic and facts are ๐Ÿ™‚

    1. +ceyhun fazilov …that.. is actually patently untrue. The amount of crop production we have right now just to sustain the meat industry alone outweighs what would be needed to sustain just humanity. (note: once the livestock we have currently created have died off. Until then, yes, it would be a LOT more)

      There are loses that happen along the way with every biological system. Cows don’t get everything out of plants, nor do we get everything from cows. Skipping the middle man would be significantly more efficient.

      Although it must be said.. efficiency alone is not a valid reason to make people forgo meat as an option.

    2. Actually, you’re incorrect. Yes, much of our agriculture goes towards sustaining meat animals, but trying to claim we’d have some vast surplus of crops is wrong. Animals can subsist on crops that aren’t fit for human consumption, and thus can be produced in larger quantities in the same amount of area, while you seem to think that it’s a 1:1 ratio of human food vs animal food. Land that is incapable of supporting crops that we can subsist on can still be used for grazing, animal feed production, etc. Additionally, due to the requirement of a much broader variety of protein sources by a “full vegan” humanity, enormous amounts of area would need to be ceded to growing crops.

    3. *Actually, you’re incorrect.*

      Again, patently untrue.

      *Yes, much of our agriculture goes towards sustaining meat animals, but trying to claim we’d have some vast surplus of crops is wrong.*

      I’m not saying we’d have some “vast” surplus. If someone is, that’s them, and not me(though what I am saying *does* come close. But there are reasons as to why what I’m saying is different, beyond just semantics). Anyway, to continue:

      Number of *some* animals for 2008 *alone* (USDA numbers):

      Cattle: 35,507,500 (~430/1000lbs usable)(6lbs feed ~ 1lbs beef)
      Pigs: 116,558,900 (~180/250lbs usable) (3.5lbs feed ~ 1lb pork)
      Broiler chickens: 9,005,578,000 (70% usable) (2lbs feed ~ .7lbs chicken)
      Turkeys: 271,245,000 (~8/21.5lbs usable) (35lbs feed ~ 8lbs turkey)

      Or to use Cornell’s numbers:

      “Chicken meat production consumes energy in a 4:1 ratio to protein output; beef cattle production requires an energy input to protein output ratio of 54:1. (Lamb meat production is nearly as inefficient at 50:1, according to the ecologist’s analysis of U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics. Other ratios range from 13:1 for turkey meat and 14:1 for milk protein to 17:1 for pork and 26:1 for eggs”

      Not to mention water consumption:

      “Grain-fed beef production takes 100,000 liters of water for every kilogram of food. Raising broiler chickens takes 3,500 liters of water to make a kilogram of meat. In comparison, soybean production uses 2,000 liters for kilogram of food produced; rice, 1,912; wheat, 900; and potatoes, 500 liters.”

      Then by land, just with cows, you need 1.5-2 acres per pair of cows. I assure you, a pair of humans doesn’t need anywhere near that amount of land to live w/ *very* full stomachs.

      That’s just the US. And regardless of all of these numbers.. the *fact* remains that *loses* happen at each step. For all of the inedible weight grown on these animals.. if you just skipped the middle man, loses would be avoided. No middle man loses = less plants grown. It is patently untrue to think or suggest that somehow feeding one animal plants, and subsequently eating that animal, is more effecient, on any scale, than just eating the original item itself.

      *If we weren’t growing for animals, and instead applied *all* of that towards Animals can subsist on crops that aren’t fit for human consumption*

      You are forgetting a few questions: *Why* isn’t it fit for human consumption… *what* could be done to *make* it suitable.. and *what* could be grown instead that *is* , if it isn’t possible to make the initial edible?

      *and thus can be produced in larger quantities in the same amount of area, while you seem to think that it’s a 1:1 ratio of human food vs animal food.*

      I do not think it is a 1:1. I would *never* claim such a thing. But it merely needs to be less than *6:1* to beat beef. That is a *very* easy number to hit. Or less than 3.5:1 for pork. Or ~2.86:1 for chickens. ~4.36:1 for turkeys.

      So you see.. I’m not assuming *anywhere near* 1:1 for feed. I’m assuming numbers between 2.86:1 up to 6:1. Easy easy numbers to hit.

      *Land that is incapable of supporting crops that we can subsist on can still be used for grazing, animal feed production, etc.*

      If we can build cities and continent spanning highways.. we can make land suitable for crops. We just don’t.

      *Additionally, due to the requirement of a much broader variety of protein sources by a “full vegan” humanity, enormous amounts of area would need to be ceded to growing crops.*

      You mean land that livestock and *their* food supply take up? I concur.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *